<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 301 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109094</link>
    <description>An arbitrator cannot direct execution and registration of sale deeds where the agreement makes that obligation conditional on completion of specified contractual requirements; relief granted in manifest disregard of an express condition precedent is beyond jurisdiction and vulnerable as being outside the reference. Where the award rests on that jurisdictional defect, a civil court should not sustain it as a rule of court. The document also notes that parties not joined to the arbitration or civil proceedings are not necessary parties to appeals confined to the legality of the award as between the contracting owner and builder.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 301 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109094</link>
      <description>An arbitrator cannot direct execution and registration of sale deeds where the agreement makes that obligation conditional on completion of specified contractual requirements; relief granted in manifest disregard of an express condition precedent is beyond jurisdiction and vulnerable as being outside the reference. Where the award rests on that jurisdictional defect, a civil court should not sustain it as a rule of court. The document also notes that parties not joined to the arbitration or civil proceedings are not necessary parties to appeals confined to the legality of the award as between the contracting owner and builder.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>