<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 295 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109083</link>
    <description>The relief undertaking notification suspended only enforcement remedies and pending proceedings, not the underlying right to present a postdated cheque on its due date. Presentation of the cheque was treated as an exercise of the payee&#039;s contractual and negotiable-instrument right, so the notification did not bar the bank from presenting it. The court also found the suit and interim injunction were aimed at avoiding the statutory consequences of dishonour, and the company failed to establish prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury. The temporary injunction was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, leaving the bank&#039;s right to present the cheques intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:52:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 295 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109083</link>
      <description>The relief undertaking notification suspended only enforcement remedies and pending proceedings, not the underlying right to present a postdated cheque on its due date. Presentation of the cheque was treated as an exercise of the payee&#039;s contractual and negotiable-instrument right, so the notification did not bar the bank from presenting it. The court also found the suit and interim injunction were aimed at avoiding the statutory consequences of dishonour, and the company failed to establish prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury. The temporary injunction was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, leaving the bank&#039;s right to present the cheques intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>