<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 334 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109080</link>
    <description>A refund claim by an importer for duty paid on short-supplied goods was held to fall within the Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction, because the dispute did not attract the jurisdictional bar in the proviso to Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. The claim was supported by a Port Trust weighment certificate and the earlier tribunal view on short-delivery and refund. Applying that settled reasoning, the impugned order could not be sustained, the jurisdictional objection was rejected, and refund relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 334 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109080</link>
      <description>A refund claim by an importer for duty paid on short-supplied goods was held to fall within the Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction, because the dispute did not attract the jurisdictional bar in the proviso to Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. The claim was supported by a Port Trust weighment certificate and the earlier tribunal view on short-delivery and refund. Applying that settled reasoning, the impugned order could not be sustained, the jurisdictional objection was rejected, and refund relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>