<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109078</link>
    <description>Where genuine factory-gate sales exist and the ex-factory price is ascertainable, valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 must be based on that price. Depot sales at a higher price do not displace the factory-gate value unless there is evidence that the factory price is not genuine. On the facts noted, no such finding or evidence existed, so the depot price was irrelevant for assessable value and the department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109078</link>
      <description>Where genuine factory-gate sales exist and the ex-factory price is ascertainable, valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 must be based on that price. Depot sales at a higher price do not displace the factory-gate value unless there is evidence that the factory price is not genuine. On the facts noted, no such finding or evidence existed, so the depot price was irrelevant for assessable value and the department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>