<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 265 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the stay application for dispensation of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, allowing the appellants to proceed without pre-deposit pending appeal. The matter involved disputes over duty demand on goods covered by exemption notifications, particularly regarding the manufacturer status of job workers. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the lower authority&#039;s findings, remanding the case for a fresh evaluation based on contractual relationships and control exercised. The Tribunal set aside the initial order and directed a comprehensive review, emphasizing the need for detailed consideration of all relevant arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:40:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 265 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the stay application for dispensation of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, allowing the appellants to proceed without pre-deposit pending appeal. The matter involved disputes over duty demand on goods covered by exemption notifications, particularly regarding the manufacturer status of job workers. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the lower authority&#039;s findings, remanding the case for a fresh evaluation based on contractual relationships and control exercised. The Tribunal set aside the initial order and directed a comprehensive review, emphasizing the need for detailed consideration of all relevant arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>