https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109063 The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 30 lakhs within two months and dispensed with the balance duty and penalty deposit conditions, staying the recovery pending compliance. The appellant failed to produce the required evidence as directed in the remand order and raised a different plea instead, leading to non-compliance with the order's requirements. Financial hardship claims were considered, but the appellant's financial status indicated the ability to deposit a partial duty amount. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not establish a prima facie case due to non-compliance with the remand order. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:47:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109063 The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 30 lakhs within two months and dispensed with the balance duty and penalty deposit conditions, staying the recovery pending compliance. The appellant failed to produce the required evidence as directed in the remand order and raised a different plea instead, leading to non-compliance with the order's requirements. Financial hardship claims were considered, but the appellant's financial status indicated the ability to deposit a partial duty amount. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not establish a prima facie case due to non-compliance with the remand order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109063