<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 422 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109056</link>
    <description>Section 4 of the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959, as amended, requires suits against Scheduled Tribe members in agency tracts to be instituted only before the designated forum with jurisdiction, and the Regulation prevails over other laws. A suit properly filed before the Agent to the Government in an agency area could not be transferred to an ordinary civil court merely because complicated legal questions were raised or bias was alleged. The special statutory forum remained exclusive, and reliance on powers under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act did not displace that jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:40:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 422 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109056</link>
      <description>Section 4 of the A.P. Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959, as amended, requires suits against Scheduled Tribe members in agency tracts to be instituted only before the designated forum with jurisdiction, and the Regulation prevails over other laws. A suit properly filed before the Agent to the Government in an agency area could not be transferred to an ordinary civil court merely because complicated legal questions were raised or bias was alleged. The special statutory forum remained exclusive, and reliance on powers under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act did not displace that jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>