<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 418 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109050</link>
    <description>Failure to file balance sheet and profit and loss account within the prescribed time was treated as a continuing offence because the statutory scheme imposed liability for each day of non-compliance and was aimed at securing ongoing compliance. On that footing, the limitation bar under the Criminal Procedure Code for a completed offence did not apply. The plea of limitation was also not accepted when raised at the end of trial after evidence had been recorded. The prosecution challenge to quashing therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 418 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109050</link>
      <description>Failure to file balance sheet and profit and loss account within the prescribed time was treated as a continuing offence because the statutory scheme imposed liability for each day of non-compliance and was aimed at securing ongoing compliance. On that footing, the limitation bar under the Criminal Procedure Code for a completed offence did not apply. The plea of limitation was also not accepted when raised at the end of trial after evidence had been recorded. The prosecution challenge to quashing therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>