<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 409 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109030</link>
    <description>State-owned corporation restructuring may include Government-directed cadre reduction where the articles authorise staffing directives and the policy is not arbitrary under Articles 14 and 16. Surplus employees may be identified through reverse seniority within each category without a prior individual hearing where the process is uniform and no prejudice is established. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes may require roster-based reconsideration because of their distinct constitutional status, while Backward Classes, women without quota appointments, deputationists, work-charged employees and absorbed employees have no equivalent retention claim. Disability protections require separate consideration of roster-based safeguards before applying last come first go.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:14:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 409 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109030</link>
      <description>State-owned corporation restructuring may include Government-directed cadre reduction where the articles authorise staffing directives and the policy is not arbitrary under Articles 14 and 16. Surplus employees may be identified through reverse seniority within each category without a prior individual hearing where the process is uniform and no prejudice is established. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes may require roster-based reconsideration because of their distinct constitutional status, while Backward Classes, women without quota appointments, deputationists, work-charged employees and absorbed employees have no equivalent retention claim. Disability protections require separate consideration of roster-based safeguards before applying last come first go.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>