<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 993 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109023</link>
    <description>The court determined that the appeal against the Company Law Board&#039;s order would be initially heard by the Division Bench for preliminary admission. However, post-admission, the appeal could be disposed of by the company judge. The court emphasized the importance of amending High Court Rules to align with Companies Act amendments for a clear appellate forum. It directed the Registry to present suggestions for amendments to the Chief Justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 993 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109023</link>
      <description>The court determined that the appeal against the Company Law Board&#039;s order would be initially heard by the Division Bench for preliminary admission. However, post-admission, the appeal could be disposed of by the company judge. The court emphasized the importance of amending High Court Rules to align with Companies Act amendments for a clear appellate forum. It directed the Registry to present suggestions for amendments to the Chief Justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>