<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 523 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109017</link>
    <description>Modvat credit of countervailing duty could be claimed on the basis of a certificate issued by the customs appraiser posted in the foreign post office. The lower authorities had treated that certificate as insufficient, but the Board&#039;s circular specifically recognised such certification as a valid basis for availing credit. In light of that circular, the denial of credit was not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to claim Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 523 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109017</link>
      <description>Modvat credit of countervailing duty could be claimed on the basis of a certificate issued by the customs appraiser posted in the foreign post office. The lower authorities had treated that certificate as insufficient, but the Board&#039;s circular specifically recognised such certification as a valid basis for availing credit. In light of that circular, the denial of credit was not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to claim Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>