<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 521 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109014</link>
    <description>A communication can be treated as a refund claim only if it clearly discloses the nature of the refund sought and states the necessary particulars of duty payment, amount claimed, and relevant period. A letter seeking unrelated administrative relief, without any reference to refund, protest, or identifiable refund particulars, is not a refund application in substance or form. On that basis, the refund request was held not maintainable, and the rejection of refund was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:12:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 521 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109014</link>
      <description>A communication can be treated as a refund claim only if it clearly discloses the nature of the refund sought and states the necessary particulars of duty payment, amount claimed, and relevant period. A letter seeking unrelated administrative relief, without any reference to refund, protest, or identifiable refund particulars, is not a refund application in substance or form. On that basis, the refund request was held not maintainable, and the rejection of refund was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>