<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 911 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109010</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the order of the learned company judge and granting the Company Applications and Petition in terms of the prayers made therein. The judge&#039;s failure to consider crucial aspects of the case and reliance on conjectures led to the decision to overturn the order. The court emphasized that all relevant parties had approved the scheme and its amendments, dismissing concerns about potential adverse effects on creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 911 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109010</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the order of the learned company judge and granting the Company Applications and Petition in terms of the prayers made therein. The judge&#039;s failure to consider crucial aspects of the case and reliance on conjectures led to the decision to overturn the order. The court emphasized that all relevant parties had approved the scheme and its amendments, dismissing concerns about potential adverse effects on creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>