<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 358 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109002</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no legal basis for the confiscation of 400 imported cordless telephones. The court determined that the goods were not in violation of any laws as they were not prohibited for import under relevant provisions and circulars. The appellant successfully contested the notice proposing confiscation and penalties, leading to the order being set aside, allowing for the redemption of the goods without any fines or penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:37:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 358 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109002</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no legal basis for the confiscation of 400 imported cordless telephones. The court determined that the goods were not in violation of any laws as they were not prohibited for import under relevant provisions and circulars. The appellant successfully contested the notice proposing confiscation and penalties, leading to the order being set aside, allowing for the redemption of the goods without any fines or penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>