<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 387 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108983</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected merely because investigations or admissions in other importers&#039; cases suggest a higher price; independent evidence must show that the importer&#039;s own transaction value is incorrect. Here, the declared value matched the purchase invoice, contemporaneous imports and domestic market prices supported it, and no commercial basis justified the enhanced valuation. The assessable value enhancement was therefore unsustainable, and the confiscation and penalty based on that enhancement could not survive. The goods were to be assessed on the declared value, with release following payment of duty accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 387 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108983</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected merely because investigations or admissions in other importers&#039; cases suggest a higher price; independent evidence must show that the importer&#039;s own transaction value is incorrect. Here, the declared value matched the purchase invoice, contemporaneous imports and domestic market prices supported it, and no commercial basis justified the enhanced valuation. The assessable value enhancement was therefore unsustainable, and the confiscation and penalty based on that enhancement could not survive. The goods were to be assessed on the declared value, with release following payment of duty accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>