<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 810 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108980</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Company Law Board&#039;s conditional consent for issuing further redeemable preference shares. The conditions imposed were deemed legal under Sections 80 and 80A of the Companies Act, 1956, and not arbitrary. The court emphasized that statutory provisions would prevail over the company&#039;s Articles of Association in case of conflict.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 810 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108980</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Company Law Board&#039;s conditional consent for issuing further redeemable preference shares. The conditions imposed were deemed legal under Sections 80 and 80A of the Companies Act, 1956, and not arbitrary. The court emphasized that statutory provisions would prevail over the company&#039;s Articles of Association in case of conflict.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>