https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108970 An order of the Company Law Board passed while deciding a reference under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was treated as an order under the arbitration statute, not as one made in the oppression and mismanagement proceedings. Because the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is a self-contained code, section 5 restricts judicial intervention and section 37 makes only specified orders appealable. An order under section 8 is not among those appealable orders, and the appellate remedy under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be imported by attachment. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable for want of appellate jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:05:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108970 An order of the Company Law Board passed while deciding a reference under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was treated as an order under the arbitration statute, not as one made in the oppression and mismanagement proceedings. Because the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is a self-contained code, section 5 restricts judicial intervention and section 37 makes only specified orders appealable. An order under section 8 is not among those appealable orders, and the appellate remedy under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be imported by attachment. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable for want of appellate jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108970