<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 450 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh hearing, highlighting violations of natural justice, the issue of the unsigned order, the appellants&#039; abatement claim, duty calculation concerns, and the impact of factory closure on duty computation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing these issues and granting the appellants an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 450 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh hearing, highlighting violations of natural justice, the issue of the unsigned order, the appellants&#039; abatement claim, duty calculation concerns, and the impact of factory closure on duty computation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of addressing these issues and granting the appellants an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>