https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108946 An order under section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956 that affects a company's name and entails civil consequences must be reasoned and comply with natural justice. Where the authority merely reproduces rival submissions without explaining why they were accepted or rejected, the order is a non-speaking order and shows lack of proper application of mind. The impugned order was therefore unsustainable and was quashed, with the matter left open for reconsideration after hearing the affected party and recording reasons. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:35:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108946 An order under section 22 of the Companies Act, 1956 that affects a company's name and entails civil consequences must be reasoned and comply with natural justice. Where the authority merely reproduces rival submissions without explaining why they were accepted or rejected, the order is a non-speaking order and shows lack of proper application of mind. The impugned order was therefore unsustainable and was quashed, with the matter left open for reconsideration after hearing the affected party and recording reasons. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108946