https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108945 A writ petition was held not maintainable against a notice issued by an arbitrator appointed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the appointment had been made with the petitioner's consent and was not challenged. The Court held that the petitioner was estopped from objecting to the commencement of arbitration on the ground of non-service of notice under section 21. In view of section 16, objections to jurisdiction and arbitral proceedings had to be raised before the arbitral tribunal. The Court also held that it could not reopen the appointment process or require the parties to restart proceedings under section 21, and that reliance on an earlier decision under the 1940 Act was inapplicable. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:33:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108945 A writ petition was held not maintainable against a notice issued by an arbitrator appointed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the appointment had been made with the petitioner's consent and was not challenged. The Court held that the petitioner was estopped from objecting to the commencement of arbitration on the ground of non-service of notice under section 21. In view of section 16, objections to jurisdiction and arbitral proceedings had to be raised before the arbitral tribunal. The Court also held that it could not reopen the appointment process or require the parties to restart proceedings under section 21, and that reliance on an earlier decision under the 1940 Act was inapplicable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108945