https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108941 The court allowed the review application and restored Company Petition No. 51 of 1990. The petitioner was subject to specific conditions, including adjusting the interest rate claimed and not seeking to void transactions during the dismissal period. The petitioner was required to inform the company judge of these conditions, pay costs to the respondent-company, and file undertakings within 30 days. Non-compliance would render the restoration order ineffective, maintaining the dismissal as of January 31, 1995. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108941 The court allowed the review application and restored Company Petition No. 51 of 1990. The petitioner was subject to specific conditions, including adjusting the interest rate claimed and not seeking to void transactions during the dismissal period. The petitioner was required to inform the company judge of these conditions, pay costs to the respondent-company, and file undertakings within 30 days. Non-compliance would render the restoration order ineffective, maintaining the dismissal as of January 31, 1995. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108941