<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108915</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court modified the decree in a hire-purchase agreement dispute involving Apex Engineering and Fairgrowth. Apex Engineering was deemed to have made full and final payment due to Fairgrowth, with the transfer of title of wheel loaders upon payment of Re. 1. The Court discharged the bank guarantees and securities, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108915</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court modified the decree in a hire-purchase agreement dispute involving Apex Engineering and Fairgrowth. Apex Engineering was deemed to have made full and final payment due to Fairgrowth, with the transfer of title of wheel loaders upon payment of Re. 1. The Court discharged the bank guarantees and securities, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>