<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1319 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108912</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition under section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, which sought various reliefs related to a winding up order. The judge emphasized the official liquidator&#039;s duty to prioritize creditors&#039; interests, considering the company&#039;s substantial debt to the Department of Telecommunications. The judge affirmed the official liquidator&#039;s role in managing the company&#039;s affairs and assets for the creditors&#039; benefit, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1319 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108912</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition under section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, which sought various reliefs related to a winding up order. The judge emphasized the official liquidator&#039;s duty to prioritize creditors&#039; interests, considering the company&#039;s substantial debt to the Department of Telecommunications. The judge affirmed the official liquidator&#039;s role in managing the company&#039;s affairs and assets for the creditors&#039; benefit, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>