<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 865 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108905</link>
    <description>A court considering sanction of an amalgamation scheme must verify statutory compliance, bona fides of the majority, and overall fairness, but it does not sit in appeal over shareholders&#039; commercial wisdom. An exchange ratio fixed by recognised chartered accountants and supported by multiple valuation methods carries due weight, especially when approved by an overwhelming majority. A minority objection based only on reduced dividend income is insufficient to establish unfairness absent a defect in valuation. The scheme was sanctioned as the share exchange ratio was found fair, subject to protection of employees and discharge of the transferor-company&#039;s liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 865 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108905</link>
      <description>A court considering sanction of an amalgamation scheme must verify statutory compliance, bona fides of the majority, and overall fairness, but it does not sit in appeal over shareholders&#039; commercial wisdom. An exchange ratio fixed by recognised chartered accountants and supported by multiple valuation methods carries due weight, especially when approved by an overwhelming majority. A minority objection based only on reduced dividend income is insufficient to establish unfairness absent a defect in valuation. The scheme was sanctioned as the share exchange ratio was found fair, subject to protection of employees and discharge of the transferor-company&#039;s liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>