https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108890 Disobedience of a summons issued under section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was treated as a contravention punishable under section 56, making the complaint maintainable. The court also held that no limitation period governs the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, so delay alone cannot sustain an otherwise illegal order. On those grounds, the plea of limitation was rejected and the trial court's impugned order was set aside, with the complaint restored to proceed in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:36:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108890 Disobedience of a summons issued under section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was treated as a contravention punishable under section 56, making the complaint maintainable. The court also held that no limitation period governs the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, so delay alone cannot sustain an otherwise illegal order. On those grounds, the plea of limitation was rejected and the trial court's impugned order was set aside, with the complaint restored to proceed in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108890