<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 566 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108888</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, setting aside the duty demand on crimped waste, fiber waste, and soiled waste manufactured between December 1987 to September 1993. The Tribunal found that the duty demand based on a test report from a sample taken after the disputed period was incorrect, emphasizing the importance of testing samples from the relevant period in line with precedents from the Tribunal and the Karnataka High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 566 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108888</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, setting aside the duty demand on crimped waste, fiber waste, and soiled waste manufactured between December 1987 to September 1993. The Tribunal found that the duty demand based on a test report from a sample taken after the disputed period was incorrect, emphasizing the importance of testing samples from the relevant period in line with precedents from the Tribunal and the Karnataka High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>