<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 710 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108878</link>
    <description>The court confirmed that Defendants 2 and 3 were liable for the amount due under the promissory note. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the court appreciated the assistance provided by both counsels in deciding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 710 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108878</link>
      <description>The court confirmed that Defendants 2 and 3 were liable for the amount due under the promissory note. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the court appreciated the assistance provided by both counsels in deciding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>