<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 558 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108877</link>
    <description>Ex parte adjudication without supplying relied upon documents and without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing was treated as a clear breach of natural justice. The failure to disclose the documents requested by the appellants and the denial of hearing justified interference at the stay stage. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after supply of the relied upon documents and fresh hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 558 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108877</link>
      <description>Ex parte adjudication without supplying relied upon documents and without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing was treated as a clear breach of natural justice. The failure to disclose the documents requested by the appellants and the denial of hearing justified interference at the stay stage. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after supply of the relied upon documents and fresh hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>