<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 557 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, upholding the finality of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision regarding the calculation of rebate on excess sugar production. It held that the subsequent changed view of the law did not reopen settled disputes, and refunds could not be granted based on the new judgment as it would effectively reverse the earlier Supreme Court decision between the parties. The Tribunal emphasized that unless an order is set aside according to law, duty refunds cannot be claimed, and the changed law applied to pending cases but not finalized disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:23:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 557 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, upholding the finality of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision regarding the calculation of rebate on excess sugar production. It held that the subsequent changed view of the law did not reopen settled disputes, and refunds could not be granted based on the new judgment as it would effectively reverse the earlier Supreme Court decision between the parties. The Tribunal emphasized that unless an order is set aside according to law, duty refunds cannot be claimed, and the changed law applied to pending cases but not finalized disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>