<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 371 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the violation of principles of natural justice and inadequate consideration of evidence and contentions by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of affording proper opportunities for personal hearing and thorough verification of contentions. Both parties were allowed to present evidence to ensure a fair and comprehensive adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 371 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the violation of principles of natural justice and inadequate consideration of evidence and contentions by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of affording proper opportunities for personal hearing and thorough verification of contentions. Both parties were allowed to present evidence to ensure a fair and comprehensive adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>