https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108859 A subsequent communication seeking payment of dues does not, by itself, amount to withdrawal of an earlier request for appointment of an arbitrator, unless the withdrawal is clear and unequivocal. In a Section 11 application, the appointing authority's role is confined to the limited question of appointment and does not extend to adjudicating the underlying dispute. On that basis, the objection that the arbitration request had been abandoned was rejected, and the petitioner remained entitled to appointment of an arbitrator and continuation of the arbitral reference. en-us Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:49:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108859 A subsequent communication seeking payment of dues does not, by itself, amount to withdrawal of an earlier request for appointment of an arbitrator, unless the withdrawal is clear and unequivocal. In a Section 11 application, the appointing authority's role is confined to the limited question of appointment and does not extend to adjudicating the underlying dispute. On that basis, the objection that the arbitration request had been abandoned was rejected, and the petitioner remained entitled to appointment of an arbitrator and continuation of the arbitral reference. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108859