https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108858 A registered proprietor may restrain use of a mark where the defendant adopts the dominant and essential feature of the registered mark and overall similarity is likely to confuse consumers, even if additional words are added; on that basis, use of "House of Atlas" for bicycles and bicycle parts was held liable to restraint. By contrast, interim restraint against use of "ATLAS" in a corporate name may be refused where long-standing use, acquiescence, concurrent user, and prejudice from immediate interference make equitable relief unjust. The result was restraint only against the offending trade mark for the goods concerned, not against the corporate name. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108858 A registered proprietor may restrain use of a mark where the defendant adopts the dominant and essential feature of the registered mark and overall similarity is likely to confuse consumers, even if additional words are added; on that basis, use of "House of Atlas" for bicycles and bicycle parts was held liable to restraint. By contrast, interim restraint against use of "ATLAS" in a corporate name may be refused where long-standing use, acquiescence, concurrent user, and prejudice from immediate interference make equitable relief unjust. The result was restraint only against the offending trade mark for the goods concerned, not against the corporate name. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108858