https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108850 Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not automatically stay a landlord's eviction proceedings against a tenant merely because the tenant claims to be a sick industrial company; the statutory suspension is confined to proceedings of the kind expressly covered by the section. The text also notes that the question whether an undertaking is a sick industrial company lies within the special mechanism under the Act and is not for the Rent Controller to determine after recording evidence. An observation conferring that jurisdiction on the Rent Controller is therefore legally untenable and is set aside. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108850 Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not automatically stay a landlord's eviction proceedings against a tenant merely because the tenant claims to be a sick industrial company; the statutory suspension is confined to proceedings of the kind expressly covered by the section. The text also notes that the question whether an undertaking is a sick industrial company lies within the special mechanism under the Act and is not for the Rent Controller to determine after recording evidence. An observation conferring that jurisdiction on the Rent Controller is therefore legally untenable and is set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108850