<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 588 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108839</link>
    <description>A CEGAT interim ruling on small-scale industry notification benefit and stay of recovery found no basis for complete waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal noted that the spray guns appeared prima facie identical to those manufactured by another concern, and the limitation plea remained debatable because the brand-name ownership had not been brought to the department&#039;s knowledge, a fact relevant to notification eligibility. Complete waiver was therefore declined. Partial interim relief was granted only on condition of depositing part of the duty, after which the balance duty and penalties were stayed pending the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 588 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108839</link>
      <description>A CEGAT interim ruling on small-scale industry notification benefit and stay of recovery found no basis for complete waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal noted that the spray guns appeared prima facie identical to those manufactured by another concern, and the limitation plea remained debatable because the brand-name ownership had not been brought to the department&#039;s knowledge, a fact relevant to notification eligibility. Complete waiver was therefore declined. Partial interim relief was granted only on condition of depositing part of the duty, after which the balance duty and penalties were stayed pending the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>