https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108830 A unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator after expiry of the contractual appointment period was invalid where the petitioner had already proposed a retired Judge from the approved panel and no timely disagreement was raised. Once the agreed name was proposed and the respondent failed to act within the stipulated time, the appointment power shifted to the Court under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court therefore cancelled the respondent's appointment and appointed a retired Judge from the FICCI panel as sole arbitrator. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:17:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108830 A unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator after expiry of the contractual appointment period was invalid where the petitioner had already proposed a retired Judge from the approved panel and no timely disagreement was raised. Once the agreed name was proposed and the respondent failed to act within the stipulated time, the appointment power shifted to the Court under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court therefore cancelled the respondent's appointment and appointed a retired Judge from the FICCI panel as sole arbitrator. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108830