<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 760 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108824</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit of penalty pending appeal under section 52(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was refused because the criminal court&#039;s acquittal was not binding on the adjudicating authority or Tribunal, though it remained a relevant circumstance. The petitioner&#039;s asserted cash liquidity problems and financial hardship justified only a partial relaxation of the pre-deposit requirement. The direction was therefore modified to require deposit of 50% of the penalty and security for the balance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:48:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 760 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108824</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit of penalty pending appeal under section 52(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was refused because the criminal court&#039;s acquittal was not binding on the adjudicating authority or Tribunal, though it remained a relevant circumstance. The petitioner&#039;s asserted cash liquidity problems and financial hardship justified only a partial relaxation of the pre-deposit requirement. The direction was therefore modified to require deposit of 50% of the penalty and security for the balance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>