https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108813 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand of duty amounting to Rs. 4.10 lakhs for including the value of straw in fruit juice. The Tribunal held that the straw was not an essential part of the product based on interpretations of previous Tribunal decisions, distinguishing the percentage of straw supplied with the products. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the Assistant Commissioner's order was overturned, emphasizing that the issue was covered by previous decisions, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:10:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108813 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand of duty amounting to Rs. 4.10 lakhs for including the value of straw in fruit juice. The Tribunal held that the straw was not an essential part of the product based on interpretations of previous Tribunal decisions, distinguishing the percentage of straw supplied with the products. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the Assistant Commissioner's order was overturned, emphasizing that the issue was covered by previous decisions, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108813