https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108807 Appellate interference with an interim order under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is warranted only where the discretion is arbitrary or wholly unjust. The Delhi High Court held that a licence clause aimed at ensuring continuity of service was enabling, not mandatory, and did not require asset takeover and compensation in every case. It also upheld adjustment of the deposited amount across all licences because the appellant had treated it as relatable to all licences. The discrimination and hardship objections failed because the appellant had accepted the migration package and the dues arose from its own default. The interim conditions were therefore sustained. en-us Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:57:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108807 Appellate interference with an interim order under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is warranted only where the discretion is arbitrary or wholly unjust. The Delhi High Court held that a licence clause aimed at ensuring continuity of service was enabling, not mandatory, and did not require asset takeover and compensation in every case. It also upheld adjustment of the deposited amount across all licences because the appellant had treated it as relatable to all licences. The discrimination and hardship objections failed because the appellant had accepted the migration package and the dues arose from its own default. The interim conditions were therefore sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108807