https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108804 Disputed factual questions about the existence, timing and effect of a statutory restraint order are ordinarily not decided in inherent proceedings for quashing under section 482 CrPC. Where the plea depends on material not examined by the Magistrate, the proper course is for the accused to raise the objection before the trial court, which can assess the relevant facts and apply the governing principles on merits. On that basis, the High Court found the quashment petition not maintainable on the material placed before it and left the criminal proceedings to continue, relegating the petitioner to seek relief before the Magistrate. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:54:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108804 Disputed factual questions about the existence, timing and effect of a statutory restraint order are ordinarily not decided in inherent proceedings for quashing under section 482 CrPC. Where the plea depends on material not examined by the Magistrate, the proper course is for the accused to raise the objection before the trial court, which can assess the relevant facts and apply the governing principles on merits. On that basis, the High Court found the quashment petition not maintainable on the material placed before it and left the criminal proceedings to continue, relegating the petitioner to seek relief before the Magistrate. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108804