https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108793 The Court consolidated revisional applications challenging orders by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, ruling that the applications were maintainable under Article 227 despite alternative remedies. In a case involving a Public Limited Company and an official liquidator, the Court emphasized the need for leave from the Company Court to enforce claims against the company. Regarding depositors' proceedings, the Court held that unless a winding-up order under section 446 of the Companies Act was in place, depositors could seek redressal from the Forum. The Court affirmed the maintainability of proceedings under Article 227, emphasizing the stay of proceedings upon a winding-up order. en-us Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:36:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108793 The Court consolidated revisional applications challenging orders by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, ruling that the applications were maintainable under Article 227 despite alternative remedies. In a case involving a Public Limited Company and an official liquidator, the Court emphasized the need for leave from the Company Court to enforce claims against the company. Regarding depositors' proceedings, the Court held that unless a winding-up order under section 446 of the Companies Act was in place, depositors could seek redressal from the Forum. The Court affirmed the maintainability of proceedings under Article 227, emphasizing the stay of proceedings upon a winding-up order. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108793