https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108788 No violation of natural justice was found where the department stated that the disputed papers were not relied upon, allowed inspection and copying repeatedly, and fixed multiple personal hearings that the appellant did not attend. The challenge to the penalty therefore failed on the procedural ground. The penalty under Rule 209A was also sustained on the merits because the record indicated diversion of imported scrap without accounting and knowing facilitation of clandestine clearance by the consignee. en-us Thu, 26 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:30:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108788 No violation of natural justice was found where the department stated that the disputed papers were not relied upon, allowed inspection and copying repeatedly, and fixed multiple personal hearings that the appellant did not attend. The challenge to the penalty therefore failed on the procedural ground. The penalty under Rule 209A was also sustained on the merits because the record indicated diversion of imported scrap without accounting and knowing facilitation of clandestine clearance by the consignee. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108788