https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108781 The court concluded that it no longer had jurisdiction over the disputes presented in the applications. The petitions were seen as an attempt to open a new front in the family dispute between the two brothers. As a result, C.A. Nos. 639 and 640 of 2002 were rejected, while C.A. No. 707 of 2002 was allowed, and interim orders dated May 31, 2002, were recalled. en-us Fri, 09 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:19:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108781 The court concluded that it no longer had jurisdiction over the disputes presented in the applications. The petitions were seen as an attempt to open a new front in the family dispute between the two brothers. As a result, C.A. Nos. 639 and 640 of 2002 were rejected, while C.A. No. 707 of 2002 was allowed, and interim orders dated May 31, 2002, were recalled. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 09 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108781