<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 515 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108773</link>
    <description>Deemed credit could not be denied on the basis of wilful suppression where the assessee had disclosed its manufacturing activity and its position that it was not an independent processor. The department was already aware of the relevant facts, including production of knitted fabric and the change in duty-payment basis, so suppression was not established. Once that foundation failed, the denial of deemed credit also failed. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:57:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 515 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108773</link>
      <description>Deemed credit could not be denied on the basis of wilful suppression where the assessee had disclosed its manufacturing activity and its position that it was not an independent processor. The department was already aware of the relevant facts, including production of knitted fabric and the change in duty-payment basis, so suppression was not established. Once that foundation failed, the denial of deemed credit also failed. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>