<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 702 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108763</link>
    <description>Revocation of a CHA licence must rest on a speaking order that considers the enquiry report and the licence holder&#039;s defence. Where the impugned order is non-speaking, cryptic, and omits examination of the material and submissions, it is legally unsustainable. The proper course is to set aside such an order and remand the matter for fresh adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 702 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108763</link>
      <description>Revocation of a CHA licence must rest on a speaking order that considers the enquiry report and the licence holder&#039;s defence. Where the impugned order is non-speaking, cryptic, and omits examination of the material and submissions, it is legally unsustainable. The proper course is to set aside such an order and remand the matter for fresh adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>