<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 690 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108746</link>
    <description>Combination of Vitamins B-1, B-6 and B-12 marketed as a medicine supported a prima facie claim of therapeutic value, and the separate action of health authorities under another enactment did not atively resolve the excise classification dispute. On the material before it, the tribunal found sufficient grounds to protect the appellant from immediate deposit of duty and penalties pending final hearing, and granted waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:50:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 690 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108746</link>
      <description>Combination of Vitamins B-1, B-6 and B-12 marketed as a medicine supported a prima facie claim of therapeutic value, and the separate action of health authorities under another enactment did not atively resolve the excise classification dispute. On the material before it, the tribunal found sufficient grounds to protect the appellant from immediate deposit of duty and penalties pending final hearing, and granted waiver of pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>