<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 689 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108743</link>
    <description>A short delay in filing an appeal, when supported by a credible medical certificate showing bed rest during the relevant period, should not be rejected on limitation alone merely because no explanation is offered for the earlier part of the statutory period. The appeal was therefore fit to be entertained, and the dismissal for limitation was set aside with the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal on merits, with due regard to the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 689 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108743</link>
      <description>A short delay in filing an appeal, when supported by a credible medical certificate showing bed rest during the relevant period, should not be rejected on limitation alone merely because no explanation is offered for the earlier part of the statutory period. The appeal was therefore fit to be entertained, and the dismissal for limitation was set aside with the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal on merits, with due regard to the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>