<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 705 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108741</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi clarified the criteria for imposing penalties under the Customs Act. Penalties were upheld for one appellant admitting involvement in dealing with smuggled gold, while penalties for four other appellants were dismissed due to lack of concrete evidence linking them to the seized currency or smuggled gold. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantial evidence to establish culpability in customs enforcement cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:15:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 705 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108741</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi clarified the criteria for imposing penalties under the Customs Act. Penalties were upheld for one appellant admitting involvement in dealing with smuggled gold, while penalties for four other appellants were dismissed due to lack of concrete evidence linking them to the seized currency or smuggled gold. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantial evidence to establish culpability in customs enforcement cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>