https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108732 A contract note issued under stock exchange regulations may constitute a valid arbitration agreement even without signatures from both parties, where it incorporates the exchange bye-laws and arbitration machinery. The court treated the section 7 requirement harmoniously with the special regime governing exchange transactions and rejected the jurisdictional objection. It also reiterated that section 34 does not permit reappraisal of evidence or interference merely because the arbitrator did not discuss every document; a reasoned factual assessment is sufficient. Non-supply of written submissions in advance was held not, by itself, to amount to denial of equal treatment or a fair opportunity under section 18. The award was sustained and the challenge failed. en-us Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:05:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108732 A contract note issued under stock exchange regulations may constitute a valid arbitration agreement even without signatures from both parties, where it incorporates the exchange bye-laws and arbitration machinery. The court treated the section 7 requirement harmoniously with the special regime governing exchange transactions and rejected the jurisdictional objection. It also reiterated that section 34 does not permit reappraisal of evidence or interference merely because the arbitrator did not discuss every document; a reasoned factual assessment is sufficient. Non-supply of written submissions in advance was held not, by itself, to amount to denial of equal treatment or a fair opportunity under section 18. The award was sustained and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108732