<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 753 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108720</link>
    <description>Returned glass shells that are defective, rather than scrap, remain within the scope of refund relief under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The record supported the finding that the goods sent back by the customer were defective glass shells and not scrap, and treating every defective return as scrap would render Rule 173L ineffective. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to refund of the duty originally paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 753 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108720</link>
      <description>Returned glass shells that are defective, rather than scrap, remain within the scope of refund relief under Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The record supported the finding that the goods sent back by the customer were defective glass shells and not scrap, and treating every defective return as scrap would render Rule 173L ineffective. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to refund of the duty originally paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>