<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 556 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108718</link>
    <description>Section 16 allows the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction, including objections to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement. If the tribunal rejects a plea of lack of jurisdiction, it must continue the proceedings and make an award; the aggrieved party may then challenge that award under section 34. A jurisdiction ruling at the interim stage is not an interim arbitral award under section 31(6), because it does not finally decide a matter capable of final award treatment. A section 34 petition is therefore premature before the award is made, while an order accepting lack of jurisdiction is separately appealable under section 37(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 556 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108718</link>
      <description>Section 16 allows the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction, including objections to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement. If the tribunal rejects a plea of lack of jurisdiction, it must continue the proceedings and make an award; the aggrieved party may then challenge that award under section 34. A jurisdiction ruling at the interim stage is not an interim arbitral award under section 31(6), because it does not finally decide a matter capable of final award treatment. A section 34 petition is therefore premature before the award is made, while an order accepting lack of jurisdiction is separately appealable under section 37(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>